Comparison 1 Comparison Geometric Models and Multidimensional Scaling

نویسندگان

  • Robert L. Goldstone
  • Sam Day
  • Ji Y. Son
  • Robert Goldstone
چکیده

Introduction It might not be immediately clear why the topic of comparison warrants a whole chapter in a book on human thinking. Of course, we are often required to make decisions that involve comparing two or more alternatives and assessing their relative value. Which car should I buy? Which job is more suited to my long-term goals? Would I rather have the soup or the salad? But in the grand scheme of human cognition, it might seem that such processes could be relegated to a subheading in a chapter on decision making. In fact, comparison is one of the most integral components of human thought. Along with the related construct of similarity, comparison plays a crucial role in almost everything that we do. Furthermore, comparison itself is a powerful cognitive tool—in addition to its supporting role in other mental processes, research has demonstrated that the simple act of comparing two things can produce important changes in our knowledge. One primary function of comparison is simply to assess the similarity of two things. To understand why this is such an important part of cognition, consider the variety of processes that are hypothesized to use similarity as an input. In models of memory, recognition and reminding have been argued to rely on the similarity between a stimulus and a long-term representation (Hintzman, 1986; Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997). Models of categorization have proposed that new examples are classified based on their similarity to other category members (Medin & Schaffer, 1978; Nosofsky, 1984), or to a prototype of a category (Reed, 1972). When making inferences about unknown properties, people often appear to rely on their knowledge about other similar entities and situations to make reasonable predictions (Osherson, et al, 1990; Shepard, 1987), and people are very likely to look to similar situations from their past when understanding and solving new problems it is a rare moment in our lives when comparison and similarity do not seem to play a role. However, comparison does more than simply assess existing representations—it can also affect our understanding of the things that are being compared. For example, research in decision making has shown that people's judgments and preferences may vary significantly based on the particular comparisons that are made (Huber, Payne & Puto, 1982; Simonson, 1989). More direct evidence comes from Medin and colleagues (1993), who found that participants interpreted the features of an item differently when it …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Using Multidimensional Scaling for Assessment Economic Development of Regions

Addressing socio-economic development issues are strategic and most important for any country. Multidimensional statistical analysis methods, including comprehensive index assessment, have been successfully used to address this challenge, but they donchr('39')t cover all aspects of development, leaving some gap in the development of multidimensional metrics. The purpose of the study is to const...

متن کامل

Scaling and Fractal Concepts in Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity: Comparison of Some Models

Measurement of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks, is normally affected by flow patterns such as macro pore; however, most current techniques do  not differentiate flow types, causing major problems in describing water and chemical flows within the soil matrix. This study compares eight models for scaling Ks and predicted matrix and macro pore Ks, using a database composed of 50 datasets...

متن کامل

Paretian Similarity for Partial Comparison of Non-rigid Objects

In this paper, we address the problem of partial comparison of non-rigid objects. We introduce a new class of set-valued distances, related to the concept of Pareto optimality in economics. Such distances allow to capture intrinsic geometric similarity between parts of non-rigid objects, obtaining semantically meaningful comparison results. The numerical implementation of our method is computat...

متن کامل

A Comparison between Kubelka-Munk and Geometric Models for Prediction of Reflectance Factor of Transparent Fibers

The reflectance factors of transparent fibers, free delustering agent, are predicted by geometric as well as Kubelka-Munk models. Transparent fibers are simulated by a net of glass capillary tubes containing different solutions of dyestuffs. Based on the results, prediction of the reflectance factor of capillary net by geometric model is relatively better than those obtained from Kubelka-Munk...

متن کامل

Confronting Scaling Relations of Spiral Galaxies with Hierarchical Models of Disk Formation

The scaling relations between rotation velocity, size and luminosity form a benchmark test for any theory of disk galaxy formation. We confront recent theoretical models of disk formation to a recent large compilation of such scaling relations. We stress the importance of achieving a fair comparison between models and observations.

متن کامل

A Comparison between Kubelka-Munk and Geometric Models for Prediction of Reflectance Factor of Transparent Fibers

The reflectance factors of transparent fibers, free delustering agent, are predicted by geometric as well as Kubelka-Munk models.&#10 Transparent fibers are simulated by a net of glass capillary tubes containing different solutions of dyestuffs. Based on the results, prediction of the reflectance factor of capillary net by geometric model is relatively better than those obtained from Kubelka-Mu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008